AgeTech, Senior Care & State AI Regulations

States like Colorado and Utah have recently enacted AI-specific laws, with more states likely to follow. For the AgeTech industry and senior care providers—from ambitious startups to established home care agencies and senior living communities—this evolving regulatory landscape presents both compliance challenges and strategic opportunities.

AgeTech and senior care organizations don't need to implement comprehensive AI governance overnight. Start small, focus on practical steps that deliver multiple benefits, and build your approach over time. The most successful organizations won't just meet minimum requirements—they'll use this regulatory shift to rethink how AI can ethically and transparently enhance the lives of aging adults and everyone involved in the care ecosystem.

This guide explores practical, budget-conscious approaches for AgeTech developers, founders, investors, and senior care providers to prepare for successful co-existence with AI regulations while creating better products and services. By taking proactive steps now, organizations can avoid costly redesigns later while building trust with aging adults, caregivers, providers, and partners.

The Changing Regulatory Landscape: What You Need to Know

According to The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), “In the 2025 legislative session, so far, at least 45 states and Puerto Rico introduced at least 550 (yes: five hundred and fifty!) AI bills.”  Here's are highlights:

State of Utah

Utah Senate Bill 226 (the "Artificial Intelligence Consumer Protection Amendments") focuses primarily on transparency and disclosure requirements:

· Required Disclosures: Businesses must disclose when consumers are interacting with generative AI if the consumer explicitly asks whether they're interacting with AI (Section 13-75-103).

· High-Risk AI Interactions: Additional disclosure requirements for "high-risk AI interactions" involving health data, financial data, biometric data, or personalized advice affecting significant personal decisions (Section 13-75-101(5)).

· Liability for AI-Generated Content: Companies cannot avoid liability by claiming AI generated problematic content—they remain responsible regardless of whether AI made statements or took actions (Section 13-75-102).

· Safe Harbor Provisions: Companies that clearly disclose AI use at the beginning of and throughout interactions receive protection from enforcement actions (Section 13-75-104).

State of Colorado

Colorado Senate Bill 24-205 takes a more comprehensive risk-based approach:

· Focus on "High-Risk" AI Systems: Creates specific requirements for AI systems that make or substantially influence "consequential decisions" about healthcare, housing, education, employment, financial services, or other essential services (Section 6-1-1701(9)).

· Developer Requirements: Developers must use reasonable care to protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination, provide documentation about data used, limitations, and evaluation methods (Section 6-1-1702).

· Deployer Obligations: Organizations using high-risk AI must implement risk management programs, complete impact assessments, notify consumers about AI use, and provide explanations for adverse decisions (Section 6-1-1703).

· Small Business Exemptions: Reduced requirements for smaller organizations (fewer than 50 employees) that meet certain conditions (Section 6-1-1703(6)).

What This Means for AgeTech and Senior Care Industry

These laws will significantly impact how you design, develop, document, and deploy AI solutions in the caregiving and wellness ecosystem. Organizations of all sizes need to start planning now, even with implementation dates still months away.

How Different AgeTech Stakeholders Are Affected

Technology Startups and SMBs

The Challenge: Limited resources to address new documentation, testing, and disclosure requirements.

The Opportunity: Building compliant products from the start is more efficient than retrofitting later, and creates trust-based market differentiation.

Example: A startup developing a medication reminder system that can explain its recommendations in plain language satisfies both Utah's disclosure requirements and Colorado's explainability standards while creating a more usable product for older adults.

Regulatory Insight: Even small companies with fewer than 50 employees will need to disclose AI use under Utah's law (Section 13-75-103), though Colorado offers some exemptions for small businesses if certain conditions are met (Section 6-1-1703(6)).

Home Care Agencies

The Challenge: Understanding how AI tools used for scheduling, client matching, remote care, or in-home care monitoring might fall under regulatory requirements.

The Opportunity: Thoughtfully implemented AI can improve care coordination and operational efficiency while maintaining client trust and regulatory compliance.

Example: A home care agency using AI for staff scheduling and client matching that documents its testing for bias can demonstrate commitment to fairness while preparing for regulatory requirements.

Regulatory Insight: Under Colorado's law, if the AI system influences "consequential decisions" about health care services, additional impact assessments and notifications would be required (Sections 6-1-1701(3)(e) and 6-1-1703).

Senior Living Communities

The Challenge: Limited technical expertise to evaluate AI systems being used and ensure appropriate documentation and oversight.

The Opportunity: Even modest investments in AI governance can improve resident trust while avoiding compliance issues.

Example: A small senior living community that creates a simple inventory of AI systems in use (resident check-in tools, fall detection systems, etc.) and develops basic documentation is taking an important first step toward compliance.

Regulatory Insight: Even if your community relies on third-party technology vendors, Utah's law would still hold you responsible for AI-generated content that violates consumer protection laws (Section 13-75-102).

Budget-Friendly Strategic Steps You Can Take Now

1. Map Your AI Touchpoints

Before you can address regulations, you need to understand where and how AI touches your organization. This doesn't require expensive consultants—just a thoughtful inventory.

Simple Starting Point: Create a spreadsheet listing:

• Each AI tool or feature used in your organization

• How it interacts with seniors or impacts their care

• What decisions it influences or makes

• Who reviews its outputs

• What data goes in and what recommendations come out

Strategic Benefit: This mapping exercise often reveals opportunities to improve how AI is integrated into your services while giving you a foundation for compliance planning.

Regulatory Alignment: This inventory helps identify which systems might qualify as "high-risk AI interactions" under Utah's law (Section 13-75-101(5)) or "high-risk artificial intelligence systems" under Colorado's law (Section 6-1-1701(9)).

2. Design for Transparency Without Sacrificing User Experience

New regulations will require disclosures about AI use, but clumsy implementation can create poor experiences for seniors and staff.

Simple Starting Point: Review your current user interfaces where AI is involved, and ask:

• Would users know AI is involved in this interaction?

• Is it clear what data the AI uses and how recommendations are generated?

• Are explanations accessible to your specific users (seniors, families, caregivers)?

Strategic Benefit: Thoughtfully designed transparency builds trust with users while meeting emerging requirements. It can actually improve adoption of your AI tools.

Regulatory Alignment: Utah's "safe harbor" provisions (Section 13-75-104) protect companies that clearly disclose AI use at the beginning of and throughout interactions.

3. Implement Appropriate Human Oversight

AI regulations create exemptions or reduced requirements when human judgment remains involved in decision processes.

Simple Starting Point: For each AI system, map out:

• Who reviews the AI's recommendations or outputs

• How they can question or override those outputs

• Where decisions are documented

• How exceptions or concerns are handled

• What training is required for impacted staff

Strategic Benefit: Human oversight not only reduces regulatory burden but often improves AI performance by combining machine intelligence with human judgment, especially important in care contexts.

Regulatory Alignment: Colorado's law emphasizes the importance of human review, particularly for "consequential decisions" (Section 6-1-1703(4)(b)(iii)).

4. Create Simple, Usable Documentation

Emerging regulations will require documentation, but this doesn't have to be overwhelming, especially for smaller organizations.

Simple Starting Point: Create living documentation that serves multiple purposes:

• Brief descriptions of how each AI system works (in plain language)

• Clear statements of intended use and limitations

• Simple diagrams of data flows and decision points

• Basic records of testing for potential bias or discrimination

Strategic Benefit: Well-designed documentation helps onboard new staff, troubleshoot issues, and demonstrate compliance—giving your documentation multiple values.

Regulatory Alignment: Both Colorado (Section 6-1-1702(2)) and Utah (Section 13-75-104) laws have documentation and disclosure requirements that this approach would help satisfy.

5. Basic Testing for Potential Bias

AI systems can sometimes produce unintended results, especially when dealing with diverse senior populations.

Simple Starting Point: Even modest testing should consider:

• Different demographic groups among your residents/clients

• Common edge cases relevant to your population

• Basic checks for bias in recommendations

• Accessibility considerations for seniors with varying abilities

Strategic Benefit: Even basic testing improves product quality and reduces risk of harmful outcomes for vulnerable older adults.

Regulatory Alignment: Colorado's law specifically addresses "algorithmic discrimination" (Section 6-1-1701(1)) and requires developers and deployers to protect against it.

Practical AI Compliance: A Business-Focused Approach

1. Cost Avoidance for Startups and Small Providers

Retrofitting Costs: Redesigning AI systems to meet regulations after they're fully built will cost significantly more than building with compliance in mind from the start.

Example: A medication management AI that doesn't have explainability built in may require complete redevelopment under Colorado's law, whereas designing for transparency from the beginning is relatively straightforward.

2. Market Differentiation for Competing Care Providers

Trust as Competitive Advantage: Senior care organizations that can demonstrate responsible AI use will increasingly have an edge with privacy-conscious seniors and families.

Example: Even simple marketing materials that confidently explain how your AI works and what safeguards you've implemented can be powerful differentiators in a crowded market.

3. Risk Reduction for Resource-Limited Communities

Avoiding Costly Problems: Organizations that take even basic steps to address AI ethics and fairness are less likely to face regulatory actions or reputational damage.

Example: AI systems with at least minimal testing across diverse user populations are less likely to produce discriminatory outcomes that could lead to legal or reputational damage.

What to do now?

AgeTech Startups and SMBs

• Focus on documentation during development: Create simple explanations of how your AI works as you build

• Design for transparency from day one: Make AI disclosures part of your user experience

• Leverage open-source tools: Utilize freely available bias testing frameworks instead of expensive solutions

Home Care Agencies

• Start with inventory: Identify which of your systems use AI and might fall under regulations

• Prioritize client communication: Develop simple explanations of how AI is used in your services

• Ensure basic oversight: Make sure staff understand when they're using AI-powered tools and how to review recommendations

Senior Living Communities

• Begin with highest-impact systems: Focus first on AI systems that affect resident safety or care decisions

• Leverage vendor resources: Ask technology vendors to provide compliance documentation

• Create simple policies: Develop basic guidelines for staff on when and how to override AI recommendations

Conclusion

The emergence of state-level AI regulations represents a significant shift in how we develop and deploy technology in senior care. By taking thoughtful, budget-conscious steps now, even resource-constrained organizations can prepare for compliance while building better products and services.

Rather than viewing these regulations as obstacles, forward-thinking organizations will see them as catalysts for more thoughtful design, more transparent systems, and ultimately better experiences for seniors and their care partners.

To repeat what I proposed above: AgeTech and senior care organizations don't need to implement comprehensive AI governance overnight. Start small, focus on practical steps that deliver multiple benefits, and build your approach over time. The most successful organizations won't just meet minimum requirements—they'll use this regulatory shift to rethink how AI can ethically and transparently enhance the lives of aging adults and everyone involved in the care ecosystem.

How I Can Help

Navigating emerging AI regulations doesn't require an expensive legal team or technical consultants to get started. My services focus on orchestrating practical, budget-friendly steps that create both compliance readiness and better products:

• UX Research: Understanding how all your stakeholders interact with AI systems

• Product Strategy: Designing AI features that meet both user and regulatory needs

• Service Design: Creating workflows that incorporate appropriate human oversight and improve service delivery

• Basic AI Risk Assessment: Identifying and addressing potential issues before they become problems

• Documentation Strategy: Creating sustainable approaches to required documentation

These services help you build better products while preparing for regulations—turning a potential burden into an opportunity for innovation and differentiation.

—

This guide is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Organizations should consult with qualified legal counsel regarding their specific regulatory obligations.