Adopt AgeTech without getting burned.

You are about to commit real budget and a multi-year contract on the strength of a demo, and the vendors all sound the same.

I evaluate the products the way you would with a product team of your own: what each one actually does in your setting, what it will cost you to run once the discount expires, and which promises are a roadmap rather than a feature. You get a recommendation you can take to the board.

You need to put a system out to bid, and the RFP has to surface the real differences rather than reward the best sales deck.

I help you write the RFP, define the requirements that matter, and set the scoring, then read the responses with you. The comparison ends up being about substance and cost of ownership, not presentation.

The pilot has to answer to your board, not just please the people in the room.

We agree what success means before it starts, in hours returned to staff, cost per resident, and what families and residents actually experience. Then I give you an honest read, so the decision to scale or to walk away rests on numbers you can defend.

You bought the technology, and the savings never showed up in the budget.

Technology on its own does not release cost. I redesign the service around it: which tasks move, which roles change, how the day is run, and what the staffing model looks like afterwards. The efficiency has to land somewhere you can count it, or it is not a return.

The AI you deploy touches residents, and it is your organization that answers for it, to families, to your board, and to the state.

I put governance around what you deploy: consent, data handling, and a plain line of accountability with a named owner for every risk. It is written to satisfy a regulator and to match how the product is really used, so the exposure is managed rather than assumed.